Legal Opinion

Gust v. Van Court

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 24, 1918No. 8435PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Creek County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. Action to quiet title by E. J. Van Court against Carl Gust. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PRYOR, C.

This is an action instituted in the district court of Creek county by E. J. Van Court against Carl W. Gust, to quiet title to certain lands lying in Creek county, Okla. The defendant, Carl W. Gust, answered, setting up certain oil and gas mining leases executed to him by Fannie Lasley, Sukey Harjo, nee Lasley, Charlie Simmons. Dickey Lasley, Sam Simmons, Della Simmons, and Manda Simmons. The land involved in the controversy is 40 acres of the allotment of Emma Taylor, and the above-named' parties who executed the leases were heirs on the maternal side of said Emma Taylor,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Birkhead v. RingoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Shook ex rel. Threadgill & O'Donnell v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API