Legal Opinion

Shook ex rel. Threadgill & O'Donnell v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 30, 1964No. 40499PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

The facts briefly stated are: The law firm of Threadgill and O’Donnell were employed June IS, 1962, by Howard B. Shook to represent him in a claim against Beatrice Food Company arising out of an account upon a fifty percent contingent fee basis. On the same day the attorneys filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Tulsa County the action asking for a recovery of an estimated amount of $1,400.00 for merchandise sold and delivered by Howard B. Shook, plaintiff, to Beatrice Foods Company, defendant. On the front of the petition were the words “Attorney’s Lien Claimed.” Service of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. StilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Taylor v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Devine v. PyanhunkahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Wilkerson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Gust v. Van CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Butler v. BreckinridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Gibbs v. Geico General Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API