Birkhead v. Ringo
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Morris, Commissioner—
Affirming.
The controversy presented here is an outgrowth of Howard v. Mitchell, 268 Ky. 429, 105 S. W. (2d) 128, which was a suit to determine the rights of numerous, heirs at law of Lucius and Mary Howard. After a, tedious journey through the courts it was determined by this court that five children of Lucius and Mary were the owners of one-seventh each of the tract involved; the children of James Howard the owners of' one-seventh, and Thomas Howard, and his vendees,, Mitchell and Birkhead, the owners of one-seventh. The' lower court had declared…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chreste v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Newbert v. CunninghamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1863
- Harlan & Co. v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Hodnett v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Proctor Coal Co. v. TyeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brooks v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1967
- Exchange Bank of Kentucky v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1993
- Young v. AuxierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Brown v. Ingram's Ex'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943