Howard v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*232ORDER
MARIAN BLANK HORN, Judge.
In this Rails to Trails takings case, pursuant to the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the defendant, the United States, has requested this court to certify several questions to the Indiana Supreme Court regarding issues of state law, pursuant to Rule 64 of the Indiana Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Ind. R.App. Proc. R. 64 (2011). The United States represents that “there are no controlling precedents concerning several potentially dispositive issues” in the above captioned Howard case before this court. The United States also has requested…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Ellamae Phillips Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Menno Toews, Evelyn Toews, and Norman Meachum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Cantrell v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Howard v. United StatesIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Howard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Ats Ford Drive Investment, LLCUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Ats Ford Drive Investment, LLCUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Bradley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.