Legal Opinion
Howard v. United States
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 2011No. 94S00-1106-CQ-333PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PUBLISHED ORDER ACCEPTING CERTIFIED QUESTION
The United States Court of Federal Claims has certified a question of Indiana state law for this Court’s consideration. The question arises in Howard v. United States, - Cl.Ct. -, 2011 WL 2120526 (2011). The question, as framed by the Court of Claims, is:
“Under Indiana law, are railbanking and interim trail use pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 1247(d) uses that are within the scope of the easements acquired by the railroad companies either by prescription, condemnation, or the deed at issue; and if either is not within the scope of the easements originally…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Howard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
3Cited by9 opinions
- Howard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Ats Ford Drive Investment, LLCUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Ats Ford Drive Investment, LLCUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Bradley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Bradley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.