Legal Opinion

Howard v. United States

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 2011No. 94S00-1106-CQ-333PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUBLISHED ORDER ACCEPTING CERTIFIED QUESTION

The United States Court of Federal Claims has certified a question of Indiana state law for this Court’s consideration. The question arises in Howard v. United States, - Cl.Ct. -, 2011 WL 2120526 (2011). The question, as framed by the Court of Claims, is:

“Under Indiana law, are railbanking and interim trail use pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 1247(d) uses that are within the scope of the easements acquired by the railroad companies either by prescription, condemnation, or the deed at issue; and if either is not within the scope of the easements originally…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Howard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Howard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Ats Ford Drive Investment, LLCUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  3. Ats Ford Drive Investment, LLCUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  4. Bradley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  5. Bradley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API