Driscoll v. Providence Mutual Fire Insurance
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtMeade, J.
This appeal arises from a dispute over the extent of coverage under a business owner’s policy issued to the plaintiffs Paul and Denise Driscoll by the defendant, Providence Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Providence). In Superior Court, the Driscolls sought declaratory relief regarding the scope of coverage under their policy. After a trial based on an agreed statement of facts and the admission of certain evidence in lieu of testimony, a judgment entered declaring that the damage to the Driscolls’ property was covered under the terms of the policy. Providence’s appeal followed; we affirm.
1.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Commonwealth v. LaniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Frati v. JanniniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Jussim v. Massachusetts Bay InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. Fitchburg Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boazova v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. CoutuMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
- J.F. v. J.F.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Mulhern v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- O'Sullivan v. Hingham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.