Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. Fitchburg Mutual Insurance

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 18, 2003No. 01-P-344PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.

The plaintiff brought an action for declaratory relief in the Superior Court to determine whether the plaintiff was under a duty to defend and indemnify Patricia Trimble2 (under a homeowner’s insurance policy issued to Trimble’s *819parents) in a tort action brought by Stephanie Button against Trimble for an alleged civil battery occurring at Trimble’s and Button’s place of employment. In allowing summary judgment for the plaintiff, a Superior Court judge ruled that the plaintiff was not required to provide a defense or indemnify Trimble because the incident fell within the “business pursuits”…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cody v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Worcester Insurance v. Fells Acres Day School, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Jefferson Insurance Co. of New York v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  5. Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. v. Home InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Scottsdale Insurance v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. Laeroc Waikiki Parkside, LLC v. K.S.K. (Oahu) Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Peterborough Oil Co. v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  4. Statee ex rel. Miller v. Cutty's Des Moines Camping Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  5. Maxwell v. AIG Domestic Claims, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API