Legal Opinion

State v. McLean

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 17, 1951No. 220PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYaleNtiNe, J.

Tbis appeal presents two questions: (1) Was tbe evidence, considered in tbe light most favorable to tbe State, sufficient to withstand defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit? (2) Did tbe •court below comply with G.S. 1-180 in its charge to tbe jury? Both of these questions must be answered in tbe affirmative.

It has long been a violation of tbe common law to inflict injury upon a human being by culpable negligence, and if death results, tbe offender under certain circumstances may be called upon to answer to tbe charge of manslaughter or even murder. 99 A.L.E., 756.

With tbe development…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Drum v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. State v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Ramsbottom v. . RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. State v. . TrottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Dunlap v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Lentz v. GardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API