Lentz v. Gardin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Chief Justice.
We allowed defendant’s petition for discretionary review of the Court of Appeals’ decision that defendant was entitled to a new trial only on the issue of damages. In his new brief filed in this Court, plaintiff presented for review pursuant to N.C. App. R. 16(a), the correctness of the order of the Court of Appeals awarding defendant a new trial on the issue of damages.
Of defendant’s assignments of error we consider only those challenging the correctness of the trial court’s charge on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.
Plaintiff relies. upon this doctrine to prove his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Ridge v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Etheridge v. . EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Etheridge v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Jarrett v. High Point Trunk & Bag Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hart v. IveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Russell v. Sam Solomon Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Smith v. BohlenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Best v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1980
- Hart v. IveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992