Legal Opinion

State v. . Trott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 9, 1925PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The defendant’s motion to dismiss the action and his first prayer for instructions assail the evidence on the ground of its insufficiency to warrant a verdict of murder in the second degree or of manslaughter. It is earnestly argued that the fumes of drink had stupefied the defendant’s brain to such a degree that when he left the cotton mill he was asleep; that he was incapable of forming an intelligent estimate of the speed with which the ear was moving or of doing anything to prevent the collision; that in fact he knew nothing of Michael’s alleged recklessness and should not be charged with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. State v. FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. State v. . PottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. State v. . MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. State v. . NorwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. State v. RichSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Foster v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API