Legal Opinion

Burroughs v. Morse

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Ingham. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The declaration in this case contains a special •count on a contract between the plaintiff, when fifteen years of age, and Enos Morse, of whom defendant is administrator, whereby it was agreed that plaintiff should work for said Morse until he became of age, living in his family and being supplied with clothing and with schooling in the winter, and at the end of the time should receive a suit of •clothes, a horse, and a watch. Breach, that the schooling was not furnished as agreed, but that instead thereof plaintiff was kept at work in tlie winter season. The, declaration also contained the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Antonoff v. BassoMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Fuller v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Oakley v. Duluth Superior Dredging Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API