Legal Opinion

Lamoureux v. Genesis Pharmacy Services Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 28, 2004No. Civ. No. 3:03CV1382CFDTPSPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR EXPENSES

SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge.

The plaintiffs, Gary A. Lamoureux, Richard A. Terwilliger, (together the “Individual Plaintiffs”) and World Wide Medical Technologies, LLC (“WWMT”), commenced this action against the defendant, Genesis Pharmacy Services Inc., d/b/a Custom Care Pharmacy (“Genesis”), alleging inter alia, patent infringement in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271, false designation of origin/false advertising in violation of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), breach of contract, and unfair trade practices…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Wills v. Amerada Hess Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  4. Morse/Diesel, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  5. Thalheim v. EberheimDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lakeland Partners, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Wagner v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2006
  3. Anaheim Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API