Legal Opinion

In Re Hadeler

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1923No. Crim. No. 1120PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

The petitioner herein was convicted of a violation of Ordinance No. 5398, New Series, as amended by Ordinance No. 5490, New Series, of the city and county of San Francisco. The petitioner conducts a grocery-store in the city and county of San Francisco. Under the above-mentioned ordinances any place used for the handling, manufacturing, or sale of foodstuffs in said municipality is required to be inspected by the board of public health to determine whether it is sanitary and in order to do business is required to have issued to its proprietor a certificate by the said board of health upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Odd Fellows' Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. In Re MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. John Rapp & Son v. KielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re McKeonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API