Legal Opinion
Berman v. Bromberg
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 23, 1997No. B105552PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendants after the court denied plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a third amended complaint for violation of the Corporate Securities Act and breach of fiduciary duty. The principal issue is whether the trial court properly denied leave to amend on the ground that the proposed verified third amended complaint contained allegations contradicting prior verified complaints, rendering the third amended complaint a sham pleading.
Procedural Background
On July 18, 1995, Jack Berman (Berman) filed a complaint for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Winet v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Terry v. BenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Vallejo Development Co. v. Beck Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Owens v. Kings SupermarketCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Founding Members of Newport Beach Country Club v. Newport Beach Country Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Colores v. Board of Trustees of the California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Commerce & Industry Insurance v. Chubb Custom InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Mahan v. Charles W. Chan Ins. Agency, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc. v. City of IrvineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.