Legal Opinion
Mahan v. Charles W. Chan Ins. Agency, Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided August 23, 2017No. A147236PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStreeter, J.
*846In this appeal we consider whether two plaintiffs, 86-year-old Frederick Mahan (Fred) and his 79-year-old wife Martha Mahan (Martha),1 have stated a viable claim under the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (the Elder Abuse Act or the Act)2 against Charles W. Chan (Chan), the Charles W. Chan Insurance Agency, Inc. (the Chan Agency), Omar Kaddoura (Kaddoura), Cung Thai (Thai), and the American Brokerage Network (ABN) (collectively the Respondents), all of whom provided life insurance advisory services to them.
The facts, as alleged, begin in the mid-1990s when, long before any…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Delaney v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Doe v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Nguyen v. CalhounCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- California Ass'n of Health Facilities v. Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- McHugh v. Protective Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 2021
- In re Lincoln National Coi LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Strawn v. Morris Polich & Purdy, LLP, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.