Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Friedley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1891No. 14,671PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, J.

— This action rests upon a promissory note held by the appellees against the appellant.

The appellant filed several paragraphs of answer.

Demurrers were sustained to the third and fourth paragraphs, and proper exceptions reserved.

Replies were filed to all of the other paragraphs except the general denial.

The appellant likewise filed a cross-complaint, upon which issue was joined.

The cause was submitted to the court for trial, and at the proper time a request was made by the appellant for a special finding.

After the conclusion of the trial the court returned its special finding, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burns v. ReigelsbergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Cohn v. RumelyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. P. H. & F. M. Roots Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. BarnesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Waterbury v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Moore-Mansfield Construction Co. v. Marion, Bluffton & Eastern Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Gassman v. JarvisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API