Legal Opinion

Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. Barnes

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1891No. 170PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Lake Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNew, C. J.

The complaint of the appellee is in two paragraphs, to recover damages occasioned by fire set out by the appellant on its right of way, and alleged to have escaped upon the land of the appellee, without his fault, and through the negligence of the appellant.

Omitting introductory matter and the description of the real estate, the complaint, in substance, is as follows :

First Paragraph. During the month of July, 1887, the defendant negligently permitted large quantities of hay, dry grass, weeds, and other combustible material to accumulate and remain upon its right of way through and adjoining…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Binford v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. ReaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RoperIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Fort Wayne National Bank v. ScherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Knight v. KnightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Blair v. CurryIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API