Gassman v. Jarvis
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana
Motion to Het Aside the Verdict and Dismiss the Cause.
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, District Judge.
This is an action for the recovery of damages for a personal injury. The case was tried to a jury. At the close of the plaintiff’s testimony, counsel for the defendant gave notice (hat be desired the court to give to the jury a binding instruction to find for the defendant, and stated that he desired to be heard on that question. Thereupon the court directed the jury to withdraw- from the court room, and the question whether or not such an instruction should be given was argued by counsel for the respective parties. At the close of the argument the court reviewed the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Vertrees' Adm'r v. Newport News, Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
- Lawrence v. ShreveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
- Thrasher v. BallardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Knight v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Hooper v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- Schaffer v. Deemer Manufacturing Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1914
- Oliver v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1912
- Gassman v. JarvisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.