CACV OF COLORADO, LLC v. Stevens
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Defendant appeals general and supplemental judgments in plaintiffs favor in a contract action. The trial court concluded that Oregon’s statute of limitation for contract claims, which requires parties to file claims within six years of their accrual, applies to plaintiffs contract claim rather than Delaware’s comparable statute, which requires parties to file claims within three years of accrual. Defendant’s first two assignments of error challenge the court’s conclusion on that issue. We reject defendant’s challenge and, accordingly, affirm the general judgment. In her third assignment,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bendix Autolite Corp. v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Coastal Barge Corp. v. Coastal Zone Industrial Control BoardSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Delaware Bay Surgical Services, P.A. v. SwierSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Chase Alexa, LLC v. Kent County Levy CourtSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Saudi Basic Industries Corp. v. Mobil Yanbu Petrochemical Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Professional Collection Consultants v. LauronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Chang v. ChunCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Andrew Panico v. Portfolio Recovery AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- King v. King (In re King)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.