Legal Opinion

Meyer Chemical Company v. Anahist Co., Inc., (Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Company, Assignee, Substituted)

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 5, 1959No. Patent Appeal 6415PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, acting through the Assistant Commissioner, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences sustaining an opposition by appellee, Anahist Co., Inc., to an application by appellant, Meyer Chemical Company, to register “Almehist” as a trademark for a “Preparation for Relief of Allergic Conditions in Capsule Form.” The opposition was based on appellee’s ownership and use of “Anahist” registered as a trademark for a “Preparation for Symptomatic Relief of Colds and Allergies,” registration No. 576,575, granted June…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lauritzen & Company, Inc. v. The Borden CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Meyer Chemical Company v. Anahist Co., Inc. (Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Company, Assignee, Substituted)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. J. C. Hall Company v. Hallmark Cards, IncorporatedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  2. In re Simulations Publications, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  3. Application of Dobeckmun Company (The Dow Chemical Company, Assignee, Substituted)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  4. California Stucco Products of New England, Inc. v. Maas & Waldstein Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  5. Merritt Corporation v. Sterling Drug, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API