California Stucco Products of New England, Inc. v. Maas & Waldstein Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This appeal is from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, acting through the Assistant Commissioner, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences sustaining the opposition b5 Maas & Waldstein Co., appellee here, to the applications for registration of “Plexichrome” 1 for a “finish coating for asphalt and concrete surfaces,” and for “Plexicolor” 2 for “paint for masonry walls.” Opposer, whose earlier use is conceded, owns the trademark “Plex-tone” 3 for “industrial coating finishes for producing multiple-colored film coatings.”
The Assistant Commissioner found that…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Intercontinental Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Continental Motors CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Meyer Chemical Company v. Anahist Co., Inc., (Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Company, Assignee, Substituted)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hunt Foods and Industries, Inc. v. The Gerson Stewart Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Jerry Finn v. Cooper's IncorporatedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- Jerry Finn v. Cooper's IncorporatedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961