Legal Opinion

California Stucco Products of New England, Inc. v. Maas & Waldstein Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 2, 1959No. Patent Appeal 6429PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

This appeal is from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, acting through the Assistant Commissioner, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences sustaining the opposition b5 Maas & Waldstein Co., appellee here, to the applications for registration of “Plexichrome” 1 for a “finish coating for asphalt and concrete surfaces,” and for “Plexicolor” 2 for “paint for masonry walls.” Opposer, whose earlier use is conceded, owns the trademark “Plex-tone” 3 for “industrial coating finishes for producing multiple-colored film coatings.”

The Assistant Commissioner found that…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Intercontinental Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Continental Motors CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Meyer Chemical Company v. Anahist Co., Inc., (Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Company, Assignee, Substituted)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hunt Foods and Industries, Inc. v. The Gerson Stewart Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  2. Jerry Finn v. Cooper's IncorporatedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  3. Jerry Finn v. Cooper's IncorporatedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API