Legal Opinion

Meyer Chemical Company v. Anahist Co., Inc. (Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Company, Assignee, Substituted)

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 18, 1958No. Patent Appeal 6415PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

In this appeal by the applicant from the Commissioner’s decision (114 U.S.P.Q. 354) in a trademark opposition appellee has moved, pursuant to Rule 13 of this court, 35 U.S.C.Appendix, to correct diminution of the record.

It appears from the affidavit of appel-lee’s attorney in support of the motion that appellant has omitted from the transcript of the Patent Office record filed in this court substantial parts of the testimony of three witnesses and two exhibits, which appellee desires to have certified to us by the Patent Office for inclusion in the record on appeal. It is made to…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meyer Chemical Company v. Anahist Co., Inc., (Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Company, Assignee, Substituted)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API