Legal Opinion
Lauritzen & Company, Inc. v. The Borden Company
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided November 30, 1956No. Patent Appeal 6234PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Assistant Commissioner, acting for the Commissioner of Patents, 99 U.S.P.Q. 216, reversing the decision of the Examiner of Interferences and sustaining a notice of opposition filed by appellee, The Borden Company, against an application by appellant, Lauritzen & Company, Inc., for registration of the trademark “Fortilac” as applied to “a food product in powder form containing milk serums and vegetable extracts and used in commercial baking, said food product being packaged and sold in drums.”
The notice of opposition was based upon prior…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nestle's Milk Products, Inc. v. Baker Importing Co., IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Apollo Shirt Co. v. Enro Shirt Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- Alumatone Corp. v. Vita-Var Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- West Disinfecting Co. v. Lan-O-Sheen Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- Application of MyersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In Re National Data CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Spraying Systems Company v. Delavan, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Shoe Corporation of America v. Juvenile Shoe Corporation of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- American Aloe Corporation v. Aloe Creme Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- J. R. Wood and Sons, Inc. v. Reese Jewelry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.