Legal Opinion

Segale v. Pagni

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1926No. 2724PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Coleman, C. J.:

This case is before the court on respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal and for an order affirming the judgment.

The first three grounds of the motion are based upon the proposition that there is no bill of exceptions in the record settled and allowed by the court or judge or by stipulation of the parties. There is a pretended bill of exceptions in the record, certified and sworn to by the court stenographer, but, if no effort had been made to embody a bill of exceptions in the record, the motions should be denied so far as the first three grounds are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Water Co. v. Belmont Dev. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Shirk v. PalmerNevada Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Reinhart Co. v. Oklahoma Gold Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Sodium Co. v. ShelleyNevada Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Coykendall v. GrayNevada Supreme Court · 1930
  3. City of Fallon v. Churchill County Bank Mortgage Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API