Legal Opinion

Reinhart Co. v. Oklahoma Gold Mining Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1924No. 2647PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO STRIKE AND DISMISS APPEAL

Receiver has no right to property taken in execution before his appointment. 34 Cyc. 328-9; Baldwin v. Hosmer, 25 L.R.A. 739. Attachment creditor has right to have debt satisfied, sheriff retaining property in meantime. Hunt v. Court, 35 P. 1087. Judgment lien is not affected by subsequent appointment of receiver before execution. People v. Finch, 76 P. 1120. Validity of attachment cannot be raised for first time in supreme court. Porter v. Poco, 55 Cal. 165. Point that no valid levy was made is aside from issue. 4 Cyc. 604; O'Connor v. Blake, 29 Cal. 312.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wiswall v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  2. Reynolds v. Crawfordsville First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Porter v. PicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Baldwin v. HosmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. O'Connor v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Rel. Nenzel v. District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Markwell v. GrayNevada Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Ex Rel. Gray v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Gottwals v. ManskeNevada Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Segale v. PagniNevada Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API