Legal Opinion

Coykendall v. Gray

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1930No. 2930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

DUCKER, C. J.:

This case is before us upon motions made by respondents to strike certain parts of the record on appeal and to dismiss the appeal, and upon a motion made by appellants to remand the record for corrections and amendments.

Five grounds are alleged in support of the motion to dismiss the appeal: (1) Because no original notice of appeal or undertaking on appeal, or order denying motion for a new trial, is on file in this case; (2) because it does not appear from the record in the case that any order has ever been made denying or overruling the motion for a new…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peri v. JeffersNevada Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Brockman v. UllomNevada Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Segale v. PagniNevada Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Fallon v. Churchill County Bank Mortgage Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Lovelock Lands Inc. v. Lovelock Land & Development Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Bushard v. Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Gordon v. Como Consolidated Mines Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Afriat v. AfriatNevada Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API