Coykendall v. Gray
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
DUCKER, C. J.:
This case is before us upon motions made by respondents to strike certain parts of the record on appeal and to dismiss the appeal, and upon a motion made by appellants to remand the record for corrections and amendments.
Five grounds are alleged in support of the motion to dismiss the appeal: (1) Because no original notice of appeal or undertaking on appeal, or order denying motion for a new trial, is on file in this case; (2) because it does not appear from the record in the case that any order has ever been made denying or overruling the motion for a new…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Peri v. JeffersNevada Supreme Court · 1930
- Brockman v. UllomNevada Supreme Court · 1930
- Segale v. PagniNevada Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Fallon v. Churchill County Bank Mortgage Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1935
- Lovelock Lands Inc. v. Lovelock Land & Development Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1931
- Bushard v. Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1951
- Gordon v. Como Consolidated Mines Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1933
- Afriat v. AfriatNevada Supreme Court · 1941