United States v. Barben
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
2Per curiam
The accused originally pleaded guilty to a charge of wrongful appropriation, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 121, 10 USC § 921. While testifying in mitigation and extenuation, he made statements inconsistent with that plea, and the law officer set it aside, declaring a mistrial to which the defense agreed.
Thereafter, accused was arraigned upon the same charge and specification before another court-martial and pleaded not guilty. After the prosecution had offered its evidence and rested, accused elected to testify in his own defense. On…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. DanielsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
- United States v. StiversUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
4Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. ShackelfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. DrakeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
- United States v. ThomasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. SneedU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. ShackelfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976