Legal Opinion

United States v. Barben

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 16, 1963No. 16,896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

2Per curiam

The accused originally pleaded guilty to a charge of wrongful appropriation, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 121, 10 USC § 921. While testifying in mitigation and extenuation, he made statements inconsistent with that plea, and the law officer set it aside, declaring a mistrial to which the defense agreed.

Thereafter, accused was arraigned upon the same charge and specification before another court-martial and pleaded not guilty. After the prosecution had offered its evidence and rested, accused elected to testify in his own defense. On…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. United States v. DanielsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  3. United States v. StiversUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. ShackelfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. DrakeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  3. United States v. ThomasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. SneedU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
  5. United States v. ShackelfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API