United States v. Sneed
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FELDER, Judge:
The appellant was convicted by a special court-martial with members of possessing 1058.29 grams of marihuana in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934. The sentence approved by the convening authority requires this Court to review the ease pursuant to Article 66, UCMJ.
The appellant contends that he was substantially prejudiced because the court members were allowed to examine, prior to findings, a defense exhibit which indicated that he offered to plead guilty.
At an Article 39(a) session, the trial counsel requested…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. HeflinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. DanielsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. ThomasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. KershawU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988