Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Goodman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 1, 2012No. Misc. Docket AG No. 46, September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.

On December 9, 2008, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“AGO”), the petitioner, acting through Bar Counsel, filed, against Bruce E. Goodman, the respondent, a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action, which alleged that the respondent violated the following: Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”) 1.3 Diligence, 1 1.15(a), (d) and (e) Safekeeping Property, 2 and 8.4(b), (c), and (d) Misconduct, 3 Maryland Rules 16-603 Duty to Maintain Account, 4 16-604 Trust Account-Required Deposits, 5 and 16-609(a) Prohibited Transactions; 6 and the Maryland Code (1989, 2010…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SperlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MixterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FaderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API