Legal Opinion

City of Fort Smith v. Tate

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 11, 1993No. 92-707PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

In this worker’s compensation case, appellants appeal the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission holding that appellants were responsible for the payment of the remarriage lump sum benefits under Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-527(d)(1) (1987). City of Fort Smith v. Tate, 38 Ark. App. 172, 832 S.W.2d 262 (1992). Appellants filed a petition for review with this court on June 12, 1992, which was granted on June 29, 1992. On review, wé affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals. Since we find it difficult to improve on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Locke v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Arkansas Vinegar Co. v. AshbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Hanford Produce Co. v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  4. Cherry v. LeonardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. City of Fort Smith v. TateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Citizens to Establish a Reform Party v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Board of Trustees v. StodolaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Caplener v. Bluebonnet Milling Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Gritts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API