Legal Opinion

Cherry v. Leonard

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 29, 1934No. 4-3734PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

The appellant filed his suit in Pulaski Chancery Court praying for a restraining order to prevent the -State Treasurer from paying out certain moneys, upon order of the Refunding Board, in the purchase of tenders of bonds, made to the Refunding Board, and which that board desires to accept. Plaintiff alleged that he is a resident of Pulaski County, and that he is a taxpayer and interested in the- contemplated acts of the State Treasurer and Refunding Board, which conduct complained of, he says, is in violation of the provisions of act No. 11, approved February 12, 1934; said act having been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. TrulockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. Garland Power & Development Co. v. State Board of RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Snowden v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  4. Swearingen v. SwearingenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. McDaniel v. AshworthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Fort Smith v. TateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. McLeod, Comm. of Rev. v. Santa Fe Trail Trans. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Roscoe v. Water & Sewer Improvement District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  4. City of Fort Smith v. TateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Lake City, Nettleton & Bay Road Improvement Dist. No. 1 of Craighead County v. LuehrmannCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API