Legal Opinion
Firebaugh Canal Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 4, 2000No. Nos. 95-15300, 95-16641PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Chief Judge:
The United States Government appeals a judgment entered against the Department of Interior and the Bureau of Reclamation that requires the Department to “take such reasonable and necessary actions to promptly prepare, file and pursue an application for a discharge permit” with the California Water Resources Control Board, pursuant to the Government’s duty to provide drainage under the San Luis Act. This court has jurisdiction over final judgments entered by the district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We agree with the district court that the Government’s duty to provide…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- State of South Carolina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Westlands Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Gussi, S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.