Smith v. Superior Court, Pima County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge.
The denial of a motion to quash an information filed against the petitioner, defendant below, is challenged in this special action. Since we deem appellate intervention at this juncture of the proceeding appropriate, we have assumed jurisdiction to review the subject order.
In 1970, a civil action was commenced against the defendant and others, seeking damages for the alleged fraudulent conduct of the defendants. Alternatively, rescission of a stock purchase was sought. The complaint alleged that Smith was an officer and director of Smith & Associates Investment, Inc., and that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Jarman v. OffuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Roberts v. SprayArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Mills v. DennySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Lewis v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Weekly v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- In Re the Testimony of Girdler v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- State v. BuchananArizona Supreme Court · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.