State v. Reynolds

The State brings this interlocutory appeal pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure-Criminal 3 (2018) and contends that the circuit court erred in granting appellee David Reynolds's motion to suppress evidence seized from a search of his cell phone. For reversal, the State contends that the circuit court erred as a matter of law (1) in finding that there was no nexus between Reynolds's cell phone and the criminal activity alleged *648in the search warrant and (2) in concluding that the cell phone was beyond the scope of the warrant. We dismiss for lack of a proper State appeal.

I. Facts

The…