Legal Opinion

State v. Earl

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 11, 1998No. CR 97-1310PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

The State of Arkansas brings this interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s grant of appellee Hezile Earl, Jr.’s motion to suppress evidence seized during the warrant-less search of the cab of his truck after his having been stopped for a routine traffic violation. The State’s arguments for reversal challenge the trial court’s ruling as a matter of law because it failed to find that the warrantless search of Earl’s truck was proper since the search met an exception to the warrant requirement. Because the questions presented by the State necessarily turn on the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Engram v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. State v. ThreadgillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  4. State v. OsbornSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Kearse v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API