Legal Opinion

State v. Threadgill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 3, 2011No. CR 10-872PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. BROWN, Justice.

| jThis is an interlocutory appeal by the State of Arkansas from a circuit court order granting appellee Loretta Thread-gill’s motion to suppress. The State asserts that this court has jurisdiction under Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure-Criminal 3(a) (2010), which allows interlocutory appeals on behalf of the State from pretrial orders in a felony prosecution which grant motions to suppress seized evidence under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 16.2. We hold that this court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over this matter because the circuit court’s order was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. State v. NicholsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. State v. EarlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CraneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. State v. EstradaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  3. State v. SprengerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  4. State v. CherrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  5. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API