Legal Opinion

State v. Nichols

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 20, 2005No. CR 05-374PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

The State of Arkansas brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order granting the motion to suppress filed by the three appellees in this case, Phillip Nichols, Trudy Nichols, and Dale Scamardo. At issue is whether exigent circumstances compelled a warrantless entry into the home of the appellees, and whether any such exigent circumstances were created by the investigating officer.

The facts were established at the January 26, 2005, suppression hearing by the testimony of Greenwood Police Officer Will Dawson. Dawson testified that, on June 25, 2004, he…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. State v. StephensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. State v. McCormackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. State v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. State v. HartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. Mancia-SandovalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  2. Welch v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. State v. CraneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. State v. D.S.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  5. State v. K.H.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API