Legal Opinion
Hua Lin v. Universal Card Services Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 26, 2002No. C-02-03687-JWPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CITIBANK’S MOTION TO DISMISS
WARE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a consumer credit reporting case which presents the issue of whether federal law preempts state law regarding the rights and obligations of furnishers of consumer credit information. Defendant Citibank 1 (“Citibank”) filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Hua Lin’s (“Lin”) state law claims for violations of the California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act (“CCRAA”) 2 §§ 1785.25(a)-(c) 3 on the ground that the federal Fair Credit Re porting Act (“FCRA”) 4 , 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., preempts such…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Western Mining Council v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Robert S. Robertson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Nl Industries, Inc. v. Stuart M. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. City of Redwood City, California and Albert v. Pinotti, Individually and Dba the People's Police PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Islam v. Option One Mortgage Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Roybal v. EquifaxDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2005
- Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.