Legal Opinion
Roybal v. Equifax
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 19, 2005No. CIV S 05-1207MCEKLMPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ENGLAND, District Judge.
Through the present action, Plaintiffs Daniel and Vida Roybal (“Plaintiffs”) allege that Equifax, Transunion, Experian, Rickenbacker, Medamerica, City Towing Body Shop, Inc. and Sears (collectively, “Defendants”) violated both state and federal consumer protection laws by furnishing and reporting erroneous credit information on Plaintiffs’ credit report. 1
Defendant Rickenbacker (“Rickenbacker”) now moves to dismiss Plaintiffs’ State and Federal Claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on the ground that Plaintiffs have failed to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- John Desoto v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Shirley A. Yamaguchi v. United States Department of the Air Force, and Sheila E. Widnall, Officially as Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Toby D. Nelson v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Langan v. United Services Automobile Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Islam v. Option One Mortgage Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Brown v. MortensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Feller v. First Interstate Bancsystem, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
- Lafferty v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.