Legal Opinion

People v. Southern Pacific Railroad

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1924No. Civ. No. 4107PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

In the name of the People of the State, the city of San Buenaventura brought this action to compel defendants to remove certain obstructions from an alleged public street named Kalorama Street. Judgment went for the plaintiff, and the defendants appeal.

The complaint is in two counts. The first count claims under a dedication of land for the street, and acceptance thereof by the public. The second count claims through adverse use of the described land, with claim of right so to do-, such claim being known to the owners of the land and to the public generally. The answers of the defendants deny…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schwerdtle v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. County of Inyo v. GivenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Coburn v. San Mateo CountyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1896
  4. F. A. Hihn Co. v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. City of Oakland v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Manhattan Beach v. CortelyouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. City of Billings v. Pierce Packing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Ratchford v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Smith v. City of HollisterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Stump v. Cornell Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API