Legal Opinion

Coburn v. San Mateo County

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California

Decided July 14, 1896No. 12,030PublishedCited by 23 opinions

This was a suit in equity by Loren Ooburn to restrain and enjoin respondent, the county of San Mateo, from trespassing on complainant’s premises, situate in the county of San Mateo, state of California; also to recover damages for trespasses alleged to have been committed.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity to have an act of the legislature of the state of California entitled “An act to declare certain tide lands public grounds, and granting the same to the county of San Mateo in trust for the use of the public,” approved February 27, 1898, and alleged by complainant to cover and include premises of which he is the sole and lawful owner, declared unconstitutional and void; (2) to restrain the respondent, the county of San Mateo, from trespassing upon complainant’s premises, situate in the county of San Mateo, state of California, and lying on the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  3. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Martin v. Lessee of WaddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  5. Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bartholomew v. StaheliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Granite Oil Securities, Inc. v. Douglas CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Parrott v. StewartOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Board of Com'rs of Rogers County v. BaxterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Jones v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API