Legal Opinion
Time Warner Sports Merchandising v. Chicagoland Processing Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 4, 1997No. 95 C 1364PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHAD UR, Senior District Judge.
Time Warner Sports Merchandising (“Time Warner,” a division of Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P.), World Cup ’94 Marketing (‘World Cup Domestic”) and World Cup ’94 Marketing International, B.V. (World Cup International”) 1 brought this diversity action against Chicagoland Processing (“Chicagoland”). After a good deal of procedural skirmishing, a year later Chicagoland filed an Amended Counterclaim (“ACC”), naming those three plaintiffs and four other organizations as counter-defendants. Chicagoland and all of the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Jennifer Venters v. City of Delphi and Larry IvesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- R.E. Wood, Jr. And Julie Wood v. Mid-Valley IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. YapejianIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mohammed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Peoria Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Best Buy Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Benson v. StaffordAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- TCS John Huxley America, Inc. v. Scientific Games CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Time Warner Sports Merchandising v. Chicagoland Processing Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997