Legal Opinion

Time Warner Sports Merchandising v. Chicagoland Processing Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 15, 1997No. 95 C 1364Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

This Court’s extended September 4, 1997 memorandum opinion and order, 974 F.Supp. 1163 (the “Opinion”) addressed at length the various aspects of the Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56 motion for summary judgment that had been filed by Time Warner Sports Merchandising (“Time Warner”) to dispose of the Amended Counterclaim (“ACC”) filed against it by Chicagoland Processing Corporation (“Chicagoland”). Opinion, at 974 F.Supp. at 1171-1172, which addressed ACC Count III, reserved judgment as to the possible dismissal of that claim pending further…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Noesges v. Servicemaster Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Adams v. Lockformer Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API