Legal Opinion
Rutherford v. Royal Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 20, 1926No. 2462PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Circuit Judge.
Two actions were instituted by Mrs. Laura W. Ruther■ford and the United Cigar Stores Company, one against the Royal Insurance Company to recover on a fire insurance policy, insuring a building of Mrs. Rutherford for the sum of $4,000, and the other against the Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company to recover on two policies for the aggregate sum of $15,000 insuring the same building. The two actions involved the same issues and were by consent tried together as one action. The jury, under the instruction of the court, returned a verdict for the plaintiffs in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hewins v. London Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Hamburg-Bremen Fire Insurance v. GarlingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Second Society of Universalists v. Royal InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Larkin v. Glens Falls InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Monteleone v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Stenger v. Hope Natural Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
- Dupre v. Allstate Insurance CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Mierzwa v. Florida Windstorm UnderwritingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Stahlberg v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Feinbloom v. Camden Fire Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.