Thielen v. Kostelecky
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCi-iristianson, J.
Tbe plaintiff instituted this mandamus proceeding in the district court of Stark county to compel tbe city commission of tbe city of Dickinson to issue to him a license to engage in business in tbe city of Dickinson as a retailer of alcohol and alcoholic beverages (as defined by chap. 259, Laws 1937). After bearing, tbe trial court ordered that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue, directed to tbe defendants and ordering them to forthwith issue a license to tbe plaintiff. Tbe defendants have appealed to this court from tbe decision of tbe district court.'
The facts necessary to an understanding…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- State v. BargeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- People ex rel. Fitzgerald v. HarrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
- City of Tacoma v. KeiselWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- State ex rel. Howie v. Common CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- City of Duluth v. CervenySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Saperstein v. BassTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
- Mayor Common Council of City of Prescott v. RandallArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Mini Mart, Inc. v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Gartland v. TalbottIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.