Legal Opinion
City of Tacoma v. Keisel
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1912No. 10206PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered November 23, 1911, upon a trial and conviction of violating an anti-treating ordinance.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
This defendant, being the proprietor of a saloon situated in the city of Tacoma, in which he was licensed by the city to sell intoxicating liquors, was1 charged with selling intoxicating liquor in his saloon to one person to be drank on the premises by another person, in violation of the following ordinance of the city:
“An Ordinance to regulate the sale of intoxicating liquors in the city of Tacoma by the prohibition of treating, and to provide a penalty for the violation thereof.
“Be it ordained by the city of Tacoma:
“Section 1. Every licensed saloon in the city of Tacoma shall be conducted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- City of Rochester v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Mayor of Mobile v. YuilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
- Monroe v. City of LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Ex parte HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Miami v. KayfetzSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Ajax v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Randles v. Washington State Liquor Control BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Blumenthal v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.