Legal Opinion

Barstow v. Wolff

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1947No. 32176PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is a replevin action in which the right of possession of the property replevied was found to be in the defendant. The defendant thereupon applied to the district court for a special execution commanding the sheriff to return the property to him. The trial court denied the application and defendant appeals.

The record shows that plaintiffs replevied a quantity of livestock including 47 calves from the defendant. At the trial the jury found the right of possession of the livestock to be in the defendant and fixed the value of the calves at $1,880, they being the only property involved in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eickhoff v. EikenbaryNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Kunz v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. McIntosh Livestock Co. v. BuffingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Swantz v. PillowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  5. Hutchinson Gin Co. v. Latimer County Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clark v. OldhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Lichty v. Federal Land Bank of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Clark v. OldhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API