Legal Opinion

Lichty v. Federal Land Bank of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1991No. 88-1033PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

Plaintiff-appellant, Rodney K. Lichty, assigns as error the district court’s sustainment of defendant-appellee The Federal Land Bank of Omaha’s motion for summary judgment and the resultant dismissal of his action to replevin a center pivot irrigation system. We affirm.

Plaintiff’s father borrowed money from intervenor-appellee, Bruning State Bank. As collateral for this and any future loans, the father granted Bruning a security interest in “all equipment, including but not limited to all farm equipment, tractors, machinery and implements,” “whether now owned or hereafter acquired.” Although…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Chadron State CollegeNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Blue Valley Bank v. Clement Bane & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. International Harvester Credit Corp. v. LechNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Barstow v. WolffNebraska Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. James C. Thomas, as Trustee of Slt Trust 1 (Rev): 9/29/83 v. E. Lawrence Price, as Trustee of the Elaine Price Trust 1983Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Harmon Cable Communications of Nebraska Ltd. Partnership v. Scope Cable Television, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Thomas v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API