Legal Opinion

Black v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 23, 2008No. 07-850 CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge.

Before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. In this action, plaintiff John Gardner Black, proceeding pro se, alleges that defendant, by and through the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), obtained an indictment on allegations that plaintiff and his companies committed securities violations based upon an incorrect market value of investment contracts and thereby effectuated a taking of property without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Defendant moves to dismiss plaintiffs complaint pursuant…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Rosales v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Thompson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. CRV Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Nance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API