State v. Presta

Appellant first claims that tbe evidence was insufficient to justify tbe verdict of bootlegging. Tbe argument is based on tbe assertion tbat tbe state not only did not offer any proof of intention to sell but tbat tbe testimony strongly tended to indicate exactly tbe contrary.

Four or five young people were spending an evening at a bouse outside, but in tbe neighborhood, of Spokane. While there, tbe appellant and a man by tbe name of Lexau came to tbe bouse in an auto, and entered. After being there a few minutes, tbe appellant stated tbat be bad something tbat was good for a cold and went…